The purpose of this site is to encourage comments by Sun readers on topics of the day, especially those affecting Anna Maria Island. We welcome any and all viewpoints and hope to stimulate intelligent discussions. Personal attacks and abusive or vulgar language, however, will not be tolerated. Such comments will be determined by Sun management, then pulled from the site and the posters may be blocked from further use.
Date: 2014-10-29 01:34:58
Subject: Part or forfeiture resolution BB
Comments: 7) Evidentiary Investigation. The City Commission may appoint an individual2 to
conduct an evidentiary investigation on the allegations set forth in the Charge of
Forfeiture and any other relevant information related thereto (hereinafter referred to
as “Evidentiary Officer”). The City Commission shall also determine the timeframe
and allowable costs for conducting the Evidentiary Investigation, which may be
modified by a majority of the City Commission. The Evidentiary Officer shall be
a. Conduct interviews;
b. Receive and review written statements and evidence;
c. Communicate with City staff, contractors, vendors, committee members,
board members, and all elected officials, including the Official who is subject
to the Forfeiture Proceedings; and
d. Take any other action necessary to provide a complete investigation.
Upon concluding the Evidentiary Investigation, the Evidentiary Officer shall provide
all direct and rebuttal testimony/evidence to the City Commission and to the Official
subject to the Forfeiture Proceedings. Unless, the Officer determines that oral or
photographic presentation of such evidence on any particular factual issue will
materially assist in the presentation of evidence, all findings and evidence, which
shall be filed in written form with a copy provided to the Official who is subject to
the Forfeiture Proceeding. The Official may be present to review any oral or
photographic presentations made by the Evidentiary Officer.
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 2 Not including any Hearing Officer or Special Master utilized by the City of Bradenton Beach,
any individual appointed pursuant to this Section shall not be employed, volunteer, or under
contract with the City of Bradenton Beach as of the date of the Initiation of Forfeiture of Office
I am not an attorney nor do I profess to be one but what kind of crap is this and who wrote it? An evidentiary officer? Where is the definition of this? What are the credentials of this officer? What are the guidelines for appointing this officer? Who will they elect? Ed Chiles? David Teitlbaum? Robert Lincoln? I say this in jest because as this is written any of those three could be appointed. How could that be legally fair or stand up in any court other than this kangaroo court that has assembled itself on the Bradenton Beach City Commission?
Name: David Johnson
Date: 2014-10-28 20:04:23
Subject: Forms of Government. For those in BB.
Comments: Republic vs. Democracy
Rule by Law vs. Rule by Majority
Just after the completion and signing of the Constitution, in reply to a woman's inquiry as to the type of government the Founders had created, Benjamin Franklin said, "A Republic, if you can keep it."
Not only have we failed to keep it, most don't even know what it is.
A Republic is representative government ruled by law (the Constitution). A democracy is direct government ruled by the majority (mob rule). A Republic recognizes the inalienable rights of individuals while democracies are only concerned with group wants or needs (the public good).
Lawmaking is a slow, deliberate process in our Constitutional Republic requiring approval from the House, Senate, Executive (President or Governor), The Supreme Court, and individual jurors (jury-nullification). Lawmaking in our unlawful democracy occurs rapidly requiring approval from the whim of the majority as determined by polls and/or voter referendums. Voter referendums allow legislators to blame bad law on the people. A good example of democracy in action is a lynch mob.
Democracies always self-destruct when the non-productive majority realizes that it can vote itself handouts from the productive minority by electing the candidate promising the most benefits from the public treasury. To maintain their power, these candidates must adopt an ever-increasing tax and spend policy to satisfy the ever-increasing desires of the majority. As taxes increase, incentive to produce decreases, causing many of the once productive to drop out and join the non-productive. When there are no longer enough producers to fund the legitimate functions of government and the socialist programs, the democracy will collapse, always to be followed by a Dictatorship.
Even though nearly every politician, teacher, journalist and citizen believes that our Founders created a democracy, it is absolutely not true. The Founders knew full well the differences between a Republic and a Democracy. They repeatedly and emphatically said that they had founded a Republic.
Article IV Section 4, of the Constitution "guarantees to every state in this union a Republican form of government".... Conversely, the word Democracy is not mentioned even once in the Constitution. Madison warned us of the dangers of democracies with these words,
"Democracies have ever been spectacles of turbulence and contention; have ever been found incompatible with personal security or the rights of property; and have in general been as short in their lives as they have been violent in their deaths...",
"We may define a republic to be ... a government which derives all its powers directly or indirectly from the great body of the people, and is administered by persons holding their offices during pleasure for a limited period, or during good behavior. It is essential to such a government that it be derived from the great body of the society, not from an inconsiderable proportion or a favored class of it; otherwise a handful of tyrannical nobles, exercising their oppressions by a delegation of their powers, might aspire to the rank of republicans and claim for their government the honorable title of republic." James Madison, Federalist No. 10, (1787)
"A wise man will not leave the right to the mercy of chance, nor wish it to prevail through the power of the majority. There is but little virtue in the action of masses of men." Henry David Thoreau (1817-1862)
Our military training manuals used to contain the correct definitions of Democracy and Republic. The following comes from Training Manual No. 2000-25 published by the War Department, November 30, 1928.
A government of the masses.
Authority derived through mass meeting or any other form of "direct" expression.
Results in mobocracy.
Attitude toward property is communistic--negating property rights.
Attitude toward law is that the will of the majority shall regulate, whether is be based upon deliberation or governed by passion, prejudice, and impulse, without restraint or regard to consequences.
Results in demogogism, license, agitation, discontent, anarchy.
Authority is derived through the election by the people of public officials best fitted to represent them.
Attitude toward law is the administration of justice in accord with fixed principles and established evidence, with a strict regard to consequences.
A greater number of citizens and extent of territory may be brought within its compass.
Avoids the dangerous extreme of either tyranny or mobocracy.
Results in statesmanship, liberty, reason, justice, contentment, and progress.
Is the "standard form" of government throughout the world.
The manuals containing these definitions were ordered destroyed without explanation about the same time that President Franklin D. Roosevelt made private ownership of our lawful money (US Minted Gold Coins) illegal. Shortly after the people turned in their gold coins, the price was increased from per ounce to per ounce. Almost overnight F.D.R., the most popular president this century (elected 4 times) looted almost half of this nation's wealth, while convincing the people that it was for their own good. Many of F.D.R.'s policies were suggested by his right hand man, Harry Hopkins, who said,
"Tax and Tax, Spend and Spend, Elect and Elect, because the people are too damn dumb to know the difference".
Name: David Johnson
Date: 2014-10-28 16:41:57
Subject: Story is straight....
Comments: Mr. Miller. I hope you are having great day. It does not sound like it by your post but I have had a wonderful day.
My story IS straight. I welcome any opportunity to debate it. You failed to identify even a single “erroneous” comment. I am in no way an “angry husband.” I supported my wife’s decision to resign from an environment where she was being targeted and harassed by the same factions that are seeking to unseat a duly elected Mayor without cause. It is true I am not a citizen of Bradenton Beach, however I have a long history of posting and commenting regarding various political issues within the County, State and Nation. About a year ago I began paying close attention to what was going on in Bradenton Beach. I read, I talk to people, I research. I support the precepts of our Representative Republic. I support adhering to the will of the electorate. I abhor efforts to disenfranchise voters. Attempts to un-seat the Mayor by methods other than the City Charter sanctioned recall procedures is objectionable.
I challenge you to debate these assertations:
· Ricinda Perry’s invoice for September was over ,000
· Blalock Walters investigated unsubstantiated harassment claims by the Public Works Department
· Ricinda Perry’s husband works for Blalock Walters
· The initial invoice from Blalock Walters was over ,000 (with more to follow)
· Vice Mayor Clarke initiated forfeiture procedures lacking substantiated findings
· Commissioner Vosburgh routinely declines making comments on the dais until Vice Mayor Clarke comments, and then concurs
· Commissioner Vosburgh’s campaign contributors are not Bradenton Beach voters/residents with the exception of Vice Mayor Clarke’s wife.
· Commissioner Vosburgh’s campaign contributors are exclusively business interests except Vice Mayor Clarke’s wife and the wife of a malcontent Bradenton Beach Public Works employee.
· Voters have a choice???
Please, tell me what is inaccurate?
Name: Bud Miller
Date: 2014-10-28 12:08:07
Subject: Get story straight
Comments: Mr. Johnson, You seem to have a lot of time on your hands to write your erroneous comments. Truth is you are the angry husband of Tammy Johnson, who was told to resign or be fired for illegally erasing emails for Mayor Shearon and his minions. You need not worry about the city of Bradenton Beach as you are not a citizen of Bradenton Beach nor have you ever been.
Name: DR SHARON OTIS
Date: 2014-10-25 19:54:23
Subject: THANK YOU
Comments: THANK YOU FOR AL THE EFFORT AND JOY YOU BRING TO THE ANNUAL CANINE HALLOWEEN. OUR HORSE ENTRY WAS OUR FOSTER GREAT DANE AND HE HAD SO MUCH FUN. YOUR HARD WORK PUT A SMILE ON MANY PEOPLE